Active Development Portfolio for Obesity Pharmacotherapy: An Analysis of Data from the ClinicalTrials.gov Registry
https://doi.org/10.30895/2312-7821-2026-14-3-263-277
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. The success of incretin receptor agonists has changed the standard of obesity pharmacotherapy and has stimulated both the development of incremental innovations based on existing medicinal products and the search for substances with fundamentally new mechanisms of action. Given the rapid diversification of the development portfolio, its systematic monitoring is required to forecast therapeutic horizons and to prepare the healthcare system in advance for the introduction of new approaches.
AIM. To perform a comprehensive analysis of the active portfolio of clinical developments in obesity pharmacotherapy in terms of the distribution across clinical trial phases, the types of molecular targets, the assessment of comorbidity outcomes, and the completeness of pharmacological profile disclosure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Data from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were analyzed. Of 726 records of the active development portfolio, 475 active interventional studies of anti-obesity medicinal products covering 210 active substances were selected.
RESULTS. The study revealed a structural asymmetry of the portfolio: radical innovations accounted for 7.6% (16 substances) and incremental innovations for 21.0% (44), while the mechanism of action of 44.8% (94) was not disclosed. A translational barrier was identified: non-incretin medicinal products had not passed beyond phase II of clinical trials, whereas phases III–IV were dominated by agonists of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptors, as well as by amylin analogues. Radical targets address the loss of muscle mass (activin type II receptor inhibitors) and the recurrence of obesity, as well as modulation of independent axes of body weight regulation: the central axis (a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor), the endocannabinoid axis, and the hepatic axis (RNA interference targeting the INHBE gene). Incremental innovations are represented by monoand multiagonists of the GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors, as well as by amylin and GLP-1 co-agonists. A paradigm shift was observed: in 18.7% (89) of the studies, comorbidity outcomes served as the primary endpoint (cardiovascular outcomes, 25.8%; carbohydrate metabolism outcomes, 24.7%). The leading sponsors of late-phase developments were Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk (90 studies). More than half of the studies (245) were concentrated in the United States. The Chinese segment (117 studies) focused on scaling up validated approaches without creating fundamentally new targets; at the same time, 26 of the 94 substances with an undisclosed mechanism of action (27.7%) are being developed under the lead sponsorship of Chinese organizations.
CONCLUSIONS. The identified translational barrier determines the medium-term prospects of obesity pharmacotherapy: in the coming years, the clinical armamentarium will be expanded primarily with multiagonists of the incretin axis and amylin analogues, whereas the need for medicinal products that preserve muscle mass and prevent obesity recurrence will remain unmet. The shift of focus toward comorbidity outcomes (the concept of obesity as a multisystem disease) requires the healthcare system to prepare for the integration of multi-target medicinal products into the standards of care for cardiovascular and metabolic complications. The high proportion of candidates with an undisclosed mechanism of action hampers comprehensive horizon scanning and strategic planning.
Keywords
About the Authors
R. I. YagudinaRussian Federation
Roza I. Yagudina, Dr. Sci. (Pharm.), Professor
8/2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991
D. S. Tsapko
Russian Federation
Daria S. Tsapko
Moscow
References
1. Müller TD, Blüher M, Tschöp MH, DiMarchi RD. Anti-obesity drug discovery: Advances and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21(3):201–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-021-00337-8
2. Arterburn DE, Wellman R, Emiliano A, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of bariatric procedures for weight loss: A PCORnet cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(11):741–50. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-2786
3. Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(11):989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032183
4. Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(3):205–16. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2206038
5. Yagudina RI, Kulikov VA. Horizon scanning as a tool for informing healthcare regulators about innovative technologies. Current Drug Supply Management. 2019;6(3):5–10 (In Russ.). EDN: MFZAMI
6. Yagudina RI, Tsapko DS. Innovative medicinal products: Current criteria, global trends, and regulatory mechanisms for accelerated access. Current Drug Supply Management. 2026;(1):29–46 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30809/solo.1.2026.3
7. Jastreboff AM, Kaplan LM, Frías JP, et al. Triple-hormone-receptor agonist retatrutide for obesity — A phase 2 trial. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(6):514–26. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2301972
8. Véniant MM, Lu SC, Atangan L. A GIPR antagonist conjugated to GLP1 analogues promotes weight loss with improved metabolic parameters in preclinical and phase 1 settings. Nat Metab. 2024;6(2):290–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-023-00966-w
9. Stefanakis K, Kokkorakis M, Mantzoros CS. The impact of weight loss on fat-free mass, muscle, bone and hematopoiesis health: Implications for emerging pharmacotherapies aiming at fat reduction and lean mass preservation. Metabolism. 2024;161:156057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2024.156057
10. Heymsfield SB, Coleman LA, Miller R, et al. Effect of bimagrumab vs placebo on body fat mass among adults with type 2 diabetes and obesity: A phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(1):e2033457. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33457
11. Aimelet V, Holst JJ. Pharmacological intervention: Challenges and promising outcomes for fat loss and preservation of lean body mass in the treatment of overweight and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025;28(2):803–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70229
12. Muntoni F, Byrne BJ, McMillan HJ, et al. The clinical development of taldefgrobep alfa: An anti-myostatin adnectin for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurol Ther. 2024;13(1):183–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00570-w
13. Wen J, Ansari U, Shehabat M, et al. The potential of SARMs and antimyostatin agents in addressing lean body mass loss from GLP1 agonists: A literature review. J Diabetes. 2025;17(8):e70119. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.70119
14. Sa M, Yoo ES, Koh W, et al. Hypothalamic GABRA5-positive neurons control obesity via astrocytic GABA. Nat Metab. 2023;5(9):1506–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-023-00877-w
15. Morningstar M, Kolodziej A, Ferreira S, et al. Novel cannabinoid receptor 1 inverse agonist CRB-913 enhances efficacy of tirzepatide, semaglutide, and liraglutide in the diet-induced obesity mouse model. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023;31(11):2676–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23902
16. Kokkorakis M, Chakhtoura M, Rhayem C, et al. Emerging pharmacotherapies for obesity: A systematic review. Pharmacol Rev. 2024;77(1):100002. https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.123.001045
17. Lu X, Huang L, Huang Z, et al. LEAP-2: An emerging endogenous ghrelin receptor antagonist in the pathophysiology of obesity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:717544. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.717544
18. Griffin JD, Buxton JM, Culver JA, et al. Hepatic activin E mediates liver-adipose inter-organ communication, suppressing adipose lipolysis in response to elevated serum fatty acids. Mol Metab. 2023;78:101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2023.101830
19. Melson E, Ashraf U, Papamargaritis D, Davies MJ. What is the pipeline for future medications for obesity? Int J Obes (Lond). 2024;49(3):433–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-024-01473-y
20. Drucker DJ. GLP-1-based therapies for diabetes, obesity and beyond. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2025;24(8):631–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-025-01183-8
21. Khan MS, Dawood MH, Handelsman Y, et al. Fat, muscle, and anti-obesity medications in cardiovascular disease prevention. Eur Heart J. 2026;47(21):2584–605. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehag201
22. Pratley RE, Denham DS, Trivedi R, et al. Apitegromab for lean mass preservation during tirzepatide-induced weight loss: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Nat Med. 2026;32(7):2673–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04440-4
23. Alexander SE, Howden EJ. Metabolic rebound and weight cycling following incretin mimetic drug withdrawal: A cause for concern? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2026;29(4):395–402. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001232
24. Englund A, Lange AH, Hagemann CA, et al. LEAP2 reduces ad libitum food intake and attenuates postprandial glucose excursions in men with obesity. Diabetes. 2026;75(6):925–37. https://doi.org/10.2337/db25-1132
25. Holm SK, Johansen VBI, Clemmensen C. LEAP2 as a therapeutic target in obesity and cardiometabolic disorders. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2026;27(3):687–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-025-10007-4
26. Deaton AM, Dubey A, Ward LD, et al. Rare loss of function variants in the hepatokine gene INHBE protect from abdominal obesity. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4319. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31757-8
27. Ling W, Huang YM, Qiao YC, et al. Human amylin: From pathology to physiology and pharmacology. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2019;20(9):944–57. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203720666190328111833
28. Lau DCW, Erichsen L, Francisco AM, et al. Once-weekly cagrilintide for weight management in people with overweight and obesity: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled, dose-finding phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10317):2160–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01751-7
29. Garvey WT, Blüher M, Osorto Contreras CK, et al. Coadministered cagrilintide and semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med. 2025;393(7):635–47. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2502081
30. Mechanick JI, Hurley DL, Garvey WT. Adiposity-based chronic disease as a new diagnostic term: the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology position statement. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(3):372–8. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP161688.PS
31. Samson SL, Bajaj M, Brinton EA, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology consensus statement: Algorithm for the management of adults with type 2 diabetes — 2026 update. Endocr Pract. 2026;32(4):473–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eprac.2026.01.006
32. Khabriev RU, Yagudina RI, Rashid MA, Arinina EE. Risk factors of adolescent health: mass poll results. Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 2020;65(3):91–9 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2020-65-3-91-
33.
Supplementary files
|
1. Неозаглавлен | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
Download
(1004KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
|
2. Неозаглавлен | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
Download
(575KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
|
|
3. Графическое резюме | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(305KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
Review
For citations:
Yagudina R.I., Tsapko D.S. Active Development Portfolio for Obesity Pharmacotherapy: An Analysis of Data from the ClinicalTrials.gov Registry. Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy. 2026;14(3):263-277. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/2312-7821-2026-14-3-263-277
JATS XML
































