Preview

Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy

Advanced search

SIGNAL AS A TOOL OF THE PHARMACOVIGILANCE

https://doi.org/10.30895/2312-7821-2018-6-2-61-67

Abstract

The European Medical Agency (EMA) in 2012 formulated modern legislation defining the procedure for pharmacovigilance — the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices (GVP), which replaced the earlier provisions of the Pharmacovigilance Guidelines for Human Medicines. The signal management position is included in one of the GVP EMA modules and became part of the EAEC GVP Rules. EMA in 2017 published a regulatory guide for detecting a signal in spontaneous reporting databases, which became an Annex to Module IX of the GVP Rules «Signal Management». The approach proposed in the Appendix supplements the classical analysis of disproportionality with other data, based on both statistical and clinical judgments. The article deals with the problem of detecting signals about the safety of medicines. The main parameters that determine the effectiveness of methods for detecting signals on disproportionality and allowing to compare the productivity of different statistical methods with respect to each other are considered. Priority directions are considered when evaluating the signal, and key elements of a qualitative method for detecting signals are drawn up, taking into account the expert opinion.

About the Authors

E. O. Zhuravleva
Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products 8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Zhuravleva Eugenia O. Head of Department for Expert Analysis of Medicinal Products’ Safety of the DEMPS. 

8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051



N. Yu. Velts
Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products 8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Velts Natalia Yu. Senior Analyst of Department of Expert Analysis Methodology of the DEMPS. PhD. 

8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051



G. V. Kutekhova
Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products 8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Kutekhova Galina V. Analyst of the 1st category of Department for Expert Analysis of Medicinal Products’ Safety of the DEMPS.

8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051



M. A. Darmostukova
Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products 8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Darmostukova Mariya A. Senior Analyst of the Department for Evaluation of MIBPs Side Effects of the DEMPS. 

8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051



R. N. Alyautdin
Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products 8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051, Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Alyautdin Renad N. Head of Division for Evaluation of Medicinal Products’ Safety. MD, DSc (Med), prof. 

8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, Moscow 127051



References

1. Federal Law of April 12, 2010 № 61-FZ “On the circulation of medicine” [Internet]. (cited 2018 March 07). Available from: http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/12174909/paragraph/1073877720:2 (In Russ.)

2. Order of Roszdravnadzor of 15.02.2017 № 1071 “On approval of the Procedure of pharmacovigilance”. [Internet]. [cited 2018 March 07]. Available from: http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/71634896/paragraph/7:4 (In Russ.)

3. Pharmacovigilance human & veterinary [Internet]. [cited 2018 March 12]. Available from: https:// ec.europa.eu/health/documents/eudralex/vol-9_en.

4. The decision of the Board Eurasian economic Commission of 3.11.2016 № 87 “About approval of Rules of Good Pharmacovigilance Practice of the Eurasian Economic Union”. [Internet] (cited 2018 March 12). Available from: http://docs.eaeunion.org/docs/ru-ru/01411948/cncd_21112016_87. (In Russ.)

5. Koshechkin KA, Rychikhina EM. Information technologies as a tool of pharmaceutical data management. The bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products 2017; 7(2): 122–5 (In Russ.)

6. CIOMS. Practical aspects of signal detection in pharmacovigilance: report of CIOMS Working Group VIII. Geneva: CIOMS; 2010.

7. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP) Module IX Addendum I — Methodological aspects of signal detection from spontaneous reports of suspected adverse reactions [Internet]. [cited 2018 March 27]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2017/10/WC500236405.pdf

8. Antoni F. Z. Wisniewski, Andrew Bate, Cedric Bousquet and others Good Signal Detection Practices: Evidence from IMI PROTECT Drug Saf. 2016; 39: 469–490. Published online 2016 Mar 7. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0405-1 [Internet]. [cited 2018 March 27]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871909/

9. Clinical safety data management: definitions and standards for expedited reporting E2A [Internet]. [cited 2018 March 29]. Available from: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E2A/Step4/E2A_Guideline.pdf

10. Screening for adverse reactions in EudraVigilance [Internet]. [cited 2018 March 27]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2016/12/WC500218606.pdf


Review

For citations:


Zhuravleva E.O., Velts N.Yu., Kutekhova G.V., Darmostukova M.A., Alyautdin R.N. SIGNAL AS A TOOL OF THE PHARMACOVIGILANCE. Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy. 2018;6(2):61-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30895/2312-7821-2018-6-2-61-67

Views: 3956


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2312-7821 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1164 (Online)